Draw for the bicameral municipal fiscal federalism, the balance is essentially a failure, but the prime minister, with his majority, decided to go forward, by consensus within the Council of Ministers, the President of the Republic has immediately announced that the decree is inadmissible for its enactment. The majority of government also asks the redefinition of attendance in the bicameral, claiming the anomaly of FLI (which did not exist during the installation of the Commission), seeking the legitimacy of the parliamentary group leaders. Bossi said the President of the Republic, declaring that it will go to Parliament to ask the question. Thus, constitutional issues and compliance with rules, which complicate even more the next few hours, the difficult game of federalism in our country.
We try to put one behind the other issues on the table. Luca Antonini, President of the Commission for the implementation of fiscal federalism does not miss the opportunity to reiterate the slogan-federalist principle of the campaign: "I see, I pay, vote": that citizens will have adequate knowledge of municipal taxes and therefore will have more elements to evaluate ' function of local administrators.
In the press conference of the Decree, the claims of the conference ranging from "Subtle Doctor" Antonini emphasis of Tremonti, for "praise" to Cattaneo and Bossi, forgetting the true ideologue of the first League , the late Professor Mile), the "poor" Calderoli, the of porcellum, worry unnecessarily, these days, you find more widely understood, has candidly stated that, if you do not define the standard cost of services, the machinery set in the field could become dangerous. But where are the criteria for the definition of these costs? Are in the process of study and experimentation. And then, what are we talking about? Until we will see them counted in € per capita does not understand anything. Other than "I see, I pay, vote" I do not see, and I pay probably will not vote in protest and distrust in the institutions. The definition of standard costs in health care and is inextricably linked to the definition of the equalization fund and Its operational. On this key issue still does not "see" anything. Professor Baldassarri (FLI, President of the Senate Finance Committee) has mentioned the risk of dependence of Commons from the management of equalization fund. How will it be managed? Who will manage? The Regions? Risk a regional centralism far worse than statist central. We would prefer an Authority National!
Professor Antonini should know that a major reform needs to inform the strategic idea. Federalism is not the end but a means of growth of the culture of subsidiarity in the sense vertical and horizontal. And 'This is the core of Catholic tradition sturziana and Local Autonomy: tradition revived in the thought and teaching in the works of Don Giussani in a memorable speech at the DC Lombard (Assago, February 6, 1987). "More companies have been less, or more room for personal creativity and social and less statist planning. The worst state and the closest to the people, that enters directly into the lives of families and individuals. The worm of democratic institutions is revealed especially in the local where the power is closer to the people, if not exercised as a service on subsidiarity, turns into a devastating enslavement of people and local communities. So, beware of a federalism that is not ancillary and supportive! Therefore, we reject any form of local Leninism, in spite of Bossi, who consecrates the league as a true Leninist party. Leninism ideology (prevalence of the party-state about the company) is added to the family nepotism, as evidenced by the "trout". And if the "Trout" is the new local ruling class of the north .... .
currently does not "see" the strategic plan which should be based on federalism: can not breathe cultural principle of subsidiarity, lack the perspective of a broad political commitment, which, with the help of everyone, should, on the political constitution, to "reform the reforms" means the Senate of self-government, constitutionally authentic Airlock and synthesis. Much more modestly that the government calls "historic turning point" question, in fact, a number of financial measures, with the increase of taxation, in some cases probably necessary (tax purpose, to stay. ...), Aimed to give a bit 'of oxygen to the municipalities financially strangled. Nothing more. "I do not see, I pay, perhaps vote! 
0 comments:
Post a Comment