![]() |
Nick Glegg, democratic liberal party leader, Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom |
Finian I leave the government ; the House the Berlusconi government should no longer have a majority, while the Senate would still be standing. Here begins the alchemy, the tactics, the Pre-tactical, the orthodox interpretations of the Constitution. In all this we do not enter. But the record policy can not remain indifferent, does not leave us "out of the fray," if by "mixed" we mean the intellectual and practical contribution to the construction of the polis, and thus the common good. E ', in a sense, the same call of "Good Morning Democrats" open space for discussion, reflection, and above all education, in the sense of introduction to the total reality, not to exercise moral-moralistic. In strictly political terms, as we have already supported in previous editorials, the events of those hours documented clearly and inevitably the end of an era. We are not referring to the end of Berlusconi, as revealed last Sunday on Corser, Ernesto Galli della Loggia: "The loneliness of a leader." Very nice article from the point of view literary, very critical of Berlusconi from the standpoint of political reading the news. Loneliness, because the leader is surrounded by the vacuum of his sycophants for convenience, solitude, blocked the path of political "liberal revolution". On this land we cross the reflection of Galli della Loggia, clarifying, in human experience, that loneliness is at the heart of every man and that it will not be un'edificazione political divide.
In terms of the political history of our country, this is the end of an era, the end of a political plan. I am not talking the person to Berlusconi, but "something" that precedes it, which he himself has become dominated, in spite of the original intuition. I call into question the project that would lead Italy to an English two-party system, though currently in the British Parliament and the Government is determining the "third force" Nick Clegg, without which the Cameron government would not stand a single more minutes. Even in the tradition of historical and political bipartisanship appears more devoted to an "other power" between the two parties are competing for leadership. E ', then, the end of bipolarity, of bipartisanship that, through different angles, has characterized the Second Republic, ranging from mattarellum, which led to consequences opposite to those assumed and sought to obtain, or fragmentation, fragmentation, multiplication of the "little people" and not the Party to English, and porcellum, which should have led to 'approval of the center right under a "disproportionate and unacceptable" majority bonus. This show is compulsive bipolar unable to guarantee stability and governability, mortifying a real and reasonable political pluralism in the country and in Parliament. Another thing is the democratic competition pole, which refers to the free association between the forces of policy areas in plural sides, far beyond of monolithic, where the leader is "primus inter pares, not a superstar." Accept the defeat of the bipolar two-party forced, in the name of a healthy democratic competition does not mean staying in the logic of the palace, putting aside the real problems of people, such as unemployment, housing for young people, bank loans, the environmental emergency ... . Bring rationality to the conduct of democratic life, taking the institutional features of civilization, it means replacing the policy issues, banks strong and firm in bringing back the debate, discussion and even confrontation. After the attack led by financial and ideological monism in view of the so-called modernization of the country, now we must rebuild the levees destroyed, reconstruction with patience and foresight, especially with the feeling of a great, passionate and reasonable ideal perspective.
0 comments:
Post a Comment