Image For Marriage Invitation In Tamil

Antifederalists

historical era of federalism and the big question is will the distribution of resources, to ensure throughout the country essential levels of assistance in health and social benefits. It 's a decisive question first in terms of cultural, institutional and political and therefore financial. In this order, the "anchor" financial is the last place because, although the first, fundamental, it follows the cultural setting in which we deal with the problem and, therefore, the capacity of government and institutions to organize rational responses. The first node cultural concerns the relationship between social and health care. There is a trend of thought, especially in times of economic and financial crisis, which perfect fit between the two tracks. Certainly no coincidence, in the sense that the subject of performance is unique: the person as such. But a "sanitation" of the social is incorrect from a methodological point of view of organization and, before that, in terms of the experience of being the same person. On this aspect we reserve adequate anthropological reflection. Institutional organization it is rather to distinguish between the two dimensions, in order to proceed in an integrated and unified. Crucial issue in a social vision is the correct home care. Offer specific health benefits, outside the hospital, is key aspect of civilization and health, according to the experience now, in thought, the World Health Organisation's definition, for whom health is not absence of disease, but personal and social welfare. If, then, that the principle of home care for specific health benefits, it goes without saying that should weave next to the patient, user, citizen member, a network of relationships, the ordinary subsidy with a twofold purpose: on the one First, support in daily life the person who is the subject of care, through programs of expression of his social life, of his own individual identity and history, and second, to support the family in the comprehensive care of the person answering, also, the need for reconciliation of work and care. In this view, the central responsibility of a person, his family and his community. E ', then, typically a social path, which is to operate organically within a health service. Therefore, reset the Fund for the non-self-sufficiency in the actions of social policy, trying to meet the social needs of the person with the Health Plan, managed by each local health authorities, as did the current government, in the proposed Act in place, Law financial means not to understand the social nature of human experience and centralization in health care facilities (which, in some regions, they give bad test if thereof) the vocation of the community, where you are calling. Also, say a true home culture means, among other things, contribute to a significant de-hospitalization, and thus significantly reduce healthcare costs by streamlining megastructures asphyxiating it. It is, therefore, a social and cultural process that goes towards greater organizational efficiency and effectiveness of health care in the hands of the same. Therefore, it seems incomprehensible that justify the centralization citing financial reasons. We ask ourselves, federalist institutional settings in which the government transfers decreased in response to the tax capacity of regions and municipalities (hereinafter "Overwhelmingly" in the sense of a tear, engages the vital issue of revenue losses in the territories economically and sociologically weaker), the State, as such, it is called, by virtue of our own philosophies ordered to federalism as stated in the reform of Title V, Part II of the Constitution, to ensure essential levels of assistance, by providing the necessary national resources. A federal state that was less that fails in its order. And then, what "federalism" are we talking about? Definitely a "federalism Antifederalists.